Thursday, November 28, 2019

Battle of Palo Alto in the Mexican-American War

Battle of Palo Alto in the Mexican-American War Battle of Palo Alto: Dates Conflict: The Battle of Palo Alto was fought on May 8, 1846, during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). Armies Commanders Americans Brigadier General Zachary Taylor2,400 menMexicansGeneral Mariano Arista3,400 men Battle of Palo Alto - Background: Having won independence from Mexico in 1836, the Republic of Texas existed as independent state for several years though many of its residents favored joining the United States. The issue was of central importance during the election of 1844. That year, James K. Polk was elected to the presidency on a pro-Texas annexation platform. Acting quickly, his predecessor, John Tyler, initiated statehood proceedings in Congress before Polk took office. Texas officially joined the Union on December 29, 1845. In response to this action, Mexico threatened war, but was persuaded against it by the British and French. After rebuffing an American offer to purchase the California and New Mexico Territories, tensions between the US and Mexico rose further in 1846, over a border dispute. Since its independence, Texas claimed the Rio Grande as its southern border, while Mexico claimed the Nueces River farther to the north. As the situation worsened, both sides sent troops to the area. Led by Brigadier General Zachary Taylor, an American Army of Occupation advanced into the disputed territory in March and constructed a supply base at Point Isabel and a fortification on the Rio Grande known as Fort Texas. These actions were observed by the Mexicans who made no efforts to impede the Americans. On April 24, General Mariano Arista arrived to take command of the Mexican Army of the North. Possessing authorization to conduct a defensive war, Arista made plans to cut Taylor off from Point Isabel. The next evening, while leading 70 US Dragoons to investigate a hacienda in the disputed territory between the rivers, Captain Seth Thornton stumbled upon a force of 2,000 Mexican soldiers. A fierce firefight ensued and 16 of Thornton’s men were killed before the remainder was forced to surrender. Battle of Palo Alto - Moving to Battle: Learning of this, Taylor sent a dispatch to Polk informing him that hostilities had commenced. Made aware of Aristas designs on Point Isabel, Taylor ensured that the defenses of Fort Texas were ready before withdrawing to cover his supplies. On May 3, Arista instructed elements of his army to open fire on Fort Texas, though he did not authorize an assault as he believed the American post would fall quickly. Able to hear the firing at Point Isabel, Taylor began planning to relieve the fort. Departing on May 7, Taylors column included 270 wagons and two 18-pdr siege guns. Alerted to Taylors movement early on May 8, Arista moved to concentrate his army at Palo Alto in an effort to block the road from Point Isabel to Fort Texas. The field he chose was a two-mile wide plain covered in green saw grass. Deploying his infantry in a mile-wide line, with artillery interspersed, Arista positioned his cavalry on the flanks. Due to the length of the Mexican line, there was no reserve. Arriving at Palo Alto, Taylor allowed his men to refill their canteens at a nearby pond before forming into a half-mile long line opposite the Mexicans. This was complicated by the need to cover the wagons (Map). Battle of Palo Alto - The Armies Clash: After scouting the Mexican line, Taylor ordered his artillery to soften Aristas position. Aristas guns opened fire but were plagued by poor powder and a lack of exploding rounds. The poor powder led to cannon balls reaching the American lines so slowly that soldiers were able to avoid them. Though intended as a preliminary movement, the actions of the American artillery became central to the battle. In the past, once artillery was emplaced, it was time consuming to move. To combat this, Major Samuel Ringgold of the 3rd US Artillery had developed a new tactic known as flying artillery. Utilizing light, mobile, bronze guns, Ringgolds highly-trained artillerymen were capable of deploying, firing several rounds, and shifting their position in short order. Riding out from the American lines, Ringgolds guns went into action delivering effective counter-battery fire as well as inflicting heavy losses on the Mexican infantry. Firing two to three rounds per minute, Ringgolds men dashed around the field for over an hour. When it became clear that Taylor was not moving to attack, Arista ordered Brigadier General Anastasio Torrejons cavalry to attack the American right. Slowed by heavy chaparral and unseen marshes, Torrejons men were blocked by the 5th US Infantry. Forming a square, the infantrymen repulsed two Mexican charges. Bringing up guns to support a third, Torrejons men were set upon by Ringgolds guns. Surging forward, the Mexicans were again turned back as the 3rd US Infantry joined the fray. By 4:00 PM, the fighting had set parts of the saw grass on fire leading to a heavy black smoke covering the field. During a pause in the fighting, Arista rotated his line from east-west to northeast-southwest. This was matched by Taylor. Pushing forward his two 18-pdrs, Taylor knocked large holes in the Mexican lines before ordering a mixed force to attack the Mexican left. This thrust was blocked by Torrejons bloodied horsemen. With his men calling for a general charge against the American line, Arista sent forward a force to turn the American left. This was met by Ringgolds guns and badly mauled. In this fighting, Ringgold was mortally wounded by a 6-pdr shot. Around 7:00 PM the fighting began to subside and Taylor ordered his men camp in line of battle. Through the night, the Mexicans gathered their wounded before departing the field after dawn. Battle of Palo Alto - Aftermath In the fighting at Palo Alto, Taylor lost 15 killed, 43 wounded, and 2 missing, while Arista suffered around 252 casualties. Allowing the Mexicans to depart unmolested, Taylor was aware that they still posed a significant threat. He was also expecting reinforcements to join his army. Moving out later in the day, he quickly encountered Arista at Resaca de la Palma. In the resulting battle, Taylor won another victory and forced the Mexicans to leave Texan soil. Occupying Matamoras on May 18, Taylor paused to await reinforcements before invading Mexico. To the north, news of the Thornton Affair reached Polk on May 9. Two days later, he asked Congress to declare war on Mexico. Congress agreed and declared war on May 13, unaware that two victories had already been won. Selected Sources Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical ParkUS-Mexican War: Battle of Palo AltoTrudeau, Noah Andre. A Band of Demons Fights for Texas. Military History Quarterly Spring 2010: 84-93.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Custers Last Stand essays

Custers Last Stand essays Americans often pride themselves for living in the land of the free. This is rather ironic considering that we stole our beloved country from its original inhabitants, the Native Americans. Not many people are aware of the severity of the numerous hardships the American Indians have faced over the years. Perhaps one of the most famous Native American conflicts is the Battle of Little Bighorn, also known as General Custers Last Stand. The end of the civil war marked the beginning of a large-scale westward movement of American Settlers. The area surrounding the Black hills proved to be especially popular due to the discovery of gold. This proved to be a problem however, because this land already had occupants; the Sioux Indians. Tensions between the settlers and the Indians had been mounting as more and more miners and settlers ignored the Treaty of Fort Laramie, which had designated the area a reservation exclusively for the Indians. Many Indians were unsatisfied by the treaty and left the reservation, and the tensions continued to rise. In 1875 United States Government issued an ultimatum to all Sioux Indians. The Ultimatum ordered the all Indians, even those who didnt have anything to do with the treaty, to proceed to the Great Sioux Reservation. This outraged the Indians because their sacred Black Hills were not part of the Reservation and many did not follow the order. In response to there unwillingness to co mply with the ultimatum General Phillip Sheridan, commander of the armed forces of the plains, decided that this mixture of Sioux and Cheyenne Indians were a threat and needed to be forced onto their reservation. Sheridan devised a three-prong invasion plan and mobilized forces in the Montana, Dakota, and Wyoming territories. In May of 1876 three groups of soldiers set off from the Wyoming, Montana and Dakota Territories on a mission to round up Native Americans and place them on the Gr...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Racial Bias in the Media Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Racial Bias in the Media - Essay Example Some bias is expected. It can not be argued that children's networks have a bias towards showing children, that women's networks show women, and that African American networks show African Americans. As consumers, it is rare to question this phenomenon. But what about networks that are for everyone Is there still a bias in what they show, and who are they biased towards When it comes to mainstream media and news, there is a particular bias towards racial minorities, one that falsely creates stereotypes and undermines the fight for equality. Black men are often portrayed as aggressive, angry, and unwilling to compromise. Latino/Latinas are portrayed as unwilling to learn English, and as drug smugglers. Native Americans are portrayed as lazy, and alcoholics. Asians are portrayed as quiet and hardworking. Are these images real While all stereotypes are based loosely on some reality, the stereotypes created by the media are even more false then those created through actual human interaction. These images are created from the very small representations of minority available in the media, most of which are already negatively slanted to begin with. But how do we know the media is creating these images There is an easy answer. Turn on the television, or open a newspaper. The vast majority of what is being seen is white, heterosexual men. The next most common group White, heterosexual women. They are seen in percentages that far outweigh the actual race percentages in the United States. In a society so passionate about equality, how does racial bias remain so strong in the media Like most forms of equality, racial equality is a long, hard battle. While the need for equality is clear, most people feel a sense of ennui if the battle takes too long. Why keep trying, when the worst battles have already been fought Does the media bias really hurt anyone Yes. Racial bias, and racism, directly affect and hurt everyone. They hurt the people who are being ignored, or being portrayed only negatively, by creating unrealistic stereotypes which they have to fight, and also by limiting the positive role models young children of color have available. Racism affects the media majority, because those same stereotypes create an unnecessary fear and a separate between races. Racism that is so clear affects society, because it limits the exposure of different cultures and groups, making understanding each other and working together for equality that much harder. Racism creates an underlying fear and tension that the United States would be much better without. However, it is important to note that not all racism, at least portrayed racism, is intentional. Even today, what is shown on television and what is read in newspapers is controlled by a very small group of people. White, upper-class, middle aged, heterosexual men. There is no direct attempt to be racist in what they put out in the media, there are no manuals telling them how to be racist. But, like all groups, they are more comfortable with a familiar face. That face is a white man, not a black woman, or an Asian child. Some, however, is intentional. By using racially unequal language, a negative image can be portrayed, only by changing one or two words. Stanford Professor Geoffrey Nunberg points out the difference between using refugee and evacuee during the Katrina crisis. By using